Editorial Workflow
Manuscript Flow in the Peer Review Process
The editorial or manuscript flow plays a pivotal role in guiding each manuscript through the peer review process. This entire process is managed electronically through online systems like Editor Manager System or Editorial Tracking System, supplemented by email correspondence.
- Submitted articles undergo an initial evaluation to ascertain their suitability within the journal's scope and adherence to specified article types. Basic grammatical checks are also performed at this stage.
- The Editor-in-Chief conducts this evaluation, followed by rigorous plagiarism checks for each submission.
- Articles passing the plagiarism check are assigned a manuscript number, while any found to be plagiarized are promptly rejected.
- Once a manuscript is assigned a number, the Editor-in-Chief invites Editors based on their expertise relevant to the submission.
- Conflict of interest is carefully considered during Editor selection.
- The assigned Editor manages the subsequent peer review process under the Editor-in-Chief's guidance.
- Potential reviewers are appointed by the Editor, who then oversees the review process.
- Reviewers are tasked with technically scrutinizing the manuscript and evaluating its organization, providing concise and clear comments.
- Reviewer comments culminate in one of four decisions: acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection.
- The Editorial Office notifies the assigned Editor upon completion of reviews and decision.
- The Editor assesses reviewer comments and determines the manuscript's fate, with their decision being final.
- Authors are informed of the decision, with revisions requested if necessary. Authors must resubmit the revised manuscript within the provided timeframe.
- The Editor reviews the revised manuscript, either making a decision or sending it back to reviewers for further evaluation.
- Throughout, the Editor-in-Chief retains the authority to intervene and make final decisions.
- A fast-track review process ensures timely completion of all stages within predetermined timeframes.
This structured workflow ensures thorough evaluation and efficient processing of manuscripts through the peer review journey.